This study examines the relationship between ESG practices and corporate performance in China’s capital-intensive industries and evaluates whether internal control quality moderates these associations. Drawing on stakeholder theory, agency theory, and institution theory, the analysis distinguishes between an external perspective and an internal perspective in understanding ESG-related performance patterns. Under the external perspective, performance is assessed using ROA and Tobin’s Q, while under the internal perspective, the analysis focuses on firm-level implementation and operational transformation, captured through employee productivity, with internal control quality reflecting governance and execution capacity. Using a balanced panel of 1718 A-share listed firms in manufacturing, construction, and transportation from 2020 to 2023, ESG scores are obtained from the HuaZheng database, firm performance and control variables from CSMAR, and internal control quality from the DIB database. Two-way fixed effects regressions are used to estimate baseline ESG-performance associations, and interaction models with simple-slope analyses are used to examine moderating patterns. The results show that ESG practices are negatively associated with ROA and Tobin’s Q, while the association between ESG practices and employee productivity is not statistically significant in the baseline model. Internal control quality positively moderates the ESG relationships with ROA and employee productivity, but not with Tobin’s Q. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of governance capacity and implementation credibility in shaping how ESG commitments are translated into performance outcomes in capital-intensive industries.

1.       Piechocka-Kałużna A, Tłuczak A, Łopatka P. The impact of CSR/ESG on the cost of capital: A case study of US companies. 2021.

2.       Velte P. Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility. 2017; 8(2): 169–178. doi: 10.1108/jgr-11-2016-0029

3.       Maaloul A, Zéghal D, Ben Amar W, et al. The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and disclosure on cost of debt: The mediating effect of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review. 2023; 26(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8

4.       Zhou G, Liu L, Luo S. Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2022; 31(7): 3371–3387. doi: 10.1002/bse.3089

5.       Barnea A, Rubin A. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010; 97: 71–86. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z

6.       Barrymore N, Sampson R C. ESG performance and labor productivity: Exploring whether and when ESG affects firm performance. Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. 2021; 1(1): 10510.

7.       Andrey E. ESG as an innovative tool to improve the efficiency and financial stability of financial organizations. Procedia Computer Science. 2023; 221: 705–709. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.041

8.       Li S, Liu Y, Xu Y. Does ESG performance improve the quantity and quality of innovation? The mediating role of internal control effectiveness and analyst coverage. Sustainability. 2022; 15(1): 104.

9.       Boulhaga M, Bouri A, Elamer AA, Ibrahim BA. Environmental, social and governance ratings and firm performance: The moderating role of internal control quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2023; 30(1): 134–145.

10.    Huang P, Jiao Y, Li S. Impact of internal control quality on the information content of social responsibility reports: A study based on text similarity—evidence from China. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2022; 45: 100558. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100558

11.    Liu H, Wu K, Zhou Q. Whether and how ESG impacts on corporate financial performance in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16584. doi: 10.3390/su142416584

12.    Shen H, Lin H, Han W, Wu H. ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research. 2023; 16(4): 100325. doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325

13.    Feng X, Mohd Saleh N. Managerial ability and ESG risks: the moderating effect of internal control quality. Sustainability. 2024; 16(22): 9838. doi: 10.3390/su16229838

14.    Zhang Y, Chen S, Li Y, Ramos DL. Does environmental protection law bring about greenwashing? Evidence from heavy-polluting firms in China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(5): 1782. doi: 10.3390/su16051782

15.    Ma Q, Ju L, Zhang Z. Innovation input and firm value: Based on the moderating effect of internal control. Sustainability. 2022; 14(18): 11156. doi: 10.3390/su141811156

16.    Deloitte Development LLC. Heads Up: Using the COSO Framework to Establish Internal Controls Over Sustainability Reporting (ICSR). Deloitte Development LLC; 2023.

17.    Afshan N, Chakrabarti D, Balaji MS. Exploring the relevance of employee productivity-linked firm performance measures: An empirical study in India. Journal of Transnational Management. 2014; 19(1): 24–37. doi: 10.1080/15475778.2014.869462

18.    APQC. Measuring productivity with revenue per employee. APQC; 2024.

19.    Salem MR, Shahimi S, Alma’amun S. Does mediation matter in explaining the relationship between ESG and bank financial performance? A scoping review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2024; 17(8): 350. doi: 10.3390/jrfm17080350

20.    Cheng M, Dhaliwal D, Zhang Y. Does investment efficiency improve after the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting? Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2013; 56(1): 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.001

21.    Sun Y. Internal control weakness disclosure and firm investment. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 2016;31(2):277–307. doi:10.1177/0148558X15598027

22.    Jung H. The impact of ESG performance on corporate value of Chinese companies. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology (IJACT). 2023; 11(3): 33–38.

23.    Asset Management Association of China, Institute of Finance, Development Research Center of the State Council. Research Report on the ESG Evaluation System of Chinese Listed Companies. Available online: https://www.amac.org.cn/hdjl/jjhywhjs/esg/202001/P020231126414991469856.pdf (accessed on 3 September 2020)

24.    Zhao C, Guo Y, Yuan J, et al. ESG and corporate financial performance: empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability. 2018; 10(8): 2607. doi:10.3390/su10082607

25.    Qureshi MA, Akbar M, Akbar A, Poulova P. Do ESG endeavors assist firms in achieving superior financial performance? A case of 100 best corporate citizens. SAGE Open. 2021; 11(2): 21582440211021598. doi: 10.1177/21582440211021598

26.    Han S, Lau YW, Saidin SF, Wei Y. ESG as one and as three: Comparative evidence on financial and non-financial performance with brand-image mediation in financial paths. Scientific Culture. 2026; 12(1.1): 1475–1503. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11425208

27.    Sweeney J, Swait J. The effects of brand credibility on customer loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2008; 15(3): 179–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.04.001

28.    Xu H, Li Y, Lin W, et al. ESG and customer stability: A perspective based on external and internal supervision and reputation mechanisms. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024; 11(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03490-8

29.    Lange D, Washburn NT. Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review. 2012; 37(2): 300–326. doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0522

30.    Park J, Lee H, Kim C. Corporate social responsibilities, consumer trust and corporate reputation: South Korean consumers’ perspectives. Journal of Business Research. 2014; 67(3): 295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.016

31.    Matos P. ESG and responsible institutional investing around the world: A critical review; 2020.

32.    Chang CH, Lin HW, Tsai WH, et al. Employee satisfaction, corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Sustainability. 2021; 13(18): 9996. doi: 10.3390/su13189996

33.    Zumente I, Bistrova J. ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: literature vs. practice. Zumente I, Bistrova J. ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: literature vs. practice. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2021; 7(2): 127. 2021;7(2): 127. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7020127

34.    Longoni A, Cagliano R. Environmental and social sustainability priorities: Their integration in operations strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2015; 35(2): 216–245.

35.    Henisz WJ, Dorobantu S, Nartey LJ. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal. 2014; 35(12): 1727–1748. doi: 10.1002/smj.2180

36.    Yu M, Zhao R. Sustainability and firm valuation: an international investigation. International journal of accounting and information management. 2015; 23(3): 289–307. doi: 10.1108/ijaim-07-2014-0050

37.    Jafar R, Basuki B, Windijarto W, et al. Environmental, social and governance disclosure and cost of equity: The moderating effects of board structures. Cogent Business & Management. 2024; 11(1): 2429794. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2429794

38.    Liang L, Ding T, Tan R, Song M. ESG performance evaluation and reporting. In: The ESG Systems in Chinese Enterprises: Theory and Practice. Springer Nature Singapore; 2025. pp. 213–242. doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-5459-8_8

39.    Hassel L, Nilsson H, Nyquist S. The value relevance of environmental performance. European Accounting Review. 2005; 14(1): 41–61. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000279722

40.    Semenova N, Hassel LG. Financial outcomes of environmental risk and opportunity for US companies. Sustainable Development. 2008; 16(3): 195–212. doi: 10.1002/sd.365

41.    Duque-Grisales E, Aguilera-Caracuel J. Environmental, social and governance scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021; 168(2): 315–334. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

42.    Cuervo-Cazurra A. Multilatinas as sources of new research insights: The learning and escape drivers of international expansion. Journal of Business Research. 2016; 69(6): 1963–1972. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.142

43.    Fiaschi D, Giuliani E, Nieri F. Overcoming the liability of origin by doing no-harm: Emerging country firms’ social irresponsibility as they go global. Journal of World Business. 2017; 52(4): 546–563. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2016.09.001

44.    Peng LS, Isa M. Environmental, social and governance practices and performance in Shariah firms: Agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance. 2020; 16(1).

45.    Garcia AS, Mendes-Da-Silva W, Orsato RJ. Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017; 150: 135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180

46.    Kalia D, Aggarwal D. Examining impact of ESG score on financial performance of healthcare companies. Journal of Global Responsibility. 2023; 14(1): 155–176. doi: 10.1108/jgr-05-2022-0045

47.    Eccles RG, Kastrapeli MD, Potter SJ. How to integrate ESG into investment decision-making: results of a global survey of institutional investors. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. 2017; 29(4): 125–133. doi: 10.1111/jacf.12267

48.    Abdallah WM, Alnamri M. Non-financial performance measures and the BSC of multinational companies with multi-cultural environment: An empirical investigation. Cross Cultural Management. 2015; 22(4): 594–607. doi:

49.    Ishikawa A, Fujimoto S, Mizuno T. Statistical properties of labor productivity distributions. Frontiers in Physics. 2022; 10: 848193. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2022.848193

50.    Song J. Corporate ESG performance and human capital investment efficiency. Finance Research Letters. 2024; 62: 105239. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105239

51.    Kemp D, Owen JR. Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business.” Resources Policy. 2013; 38(4): 523–531. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.08.003

52.    Becchetti L, Bobbio E, Prizia F, et al. Going deeper into the S of ESG: A relational approach to the definition of social responsibility. Sustainability. 2022; 14(15): 9668. doi: 10.3390/su14159668

53.    Fung B. The demand and need for transparency and disclosure in corporate governance. Universal Journal of Management. 2014; 2(2): 72–80.

54.    Fischer R, Ferreira MC, Van Meurs N, et al. Does organizational formalization facilitate voice and helping organizational citizenship behaviors? It depends on (national) uncertainty norms. Journal of International Business Studies. 2019; 50(1): 125–134. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0132-6

55.    Koufopoulos D N, Gkliatis I P, Athanasiadis K, et al. The importance of board size. Available at SSRN 3788909, 2020.

56.    Brochet F, Loumioti M, Serafeim G. Speaking of the short-term: disclosure horizon and managerial myopia. Review of Accounting Studies. 2015; 20(3): 1122–1163. doi: 10.1007/s11142-015-9329-8

57.    Unruh G, Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, et al. Investing for a sustainable future: Investors care more about sustainability than many executives believe. MIT Sloan Management Review. 2016; 57(4).

58.    Schoenmaker D, Schramade W. Investing for long-term value creation. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment. 2019; 9(4): 356–377. doi: 10.1080/20430795.2019.1625012

59.    Gu R, He Z. Can environmental regulation improve labor allocation efficiency? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7): 6058. doi: 10.3390/su15076058

60.    Piwowar-Sulej K, Malik S, Shobande OA, et al. A contribution to sustainable human resource development in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Ethics. 2024; 191(2): 337–355. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05456-3

61.    Shahzadi G, John A, Qadeer F, et al. CSR beyond symbolism: The importance of substantive attributions for employee CSR engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024; 436: 140440. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140440

62.    Lannelongue G, Gonzalez-Benito J, Quiroz I. Environmental management and labour productivity: the moderating role of capital intensity. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017; 190: 158–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.051

63.    Koo JE, Ki ES. Internal control personnel’s experience, internal control weaknesses, and ESG rating. Sustainability. 2020; 12(20): 8645. doi:

64.    Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L. Does greenwashing pay off? Understanding the relationship between environmental actions and environmental legitimacy. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017; 144(2): 363–379. doi: 10.3390/su12208645

65.    Yin Z, Zhang Z. Manager tenure, internal control and strategic differences. China Soft Science. 2016; 312: 132–143.

66.    Ruan L, Li J, Huang S. News or noise? ESG disclosure and stock price synchronicity. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2024; 95: 103483. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103483

67.    Zhang H, Sun Y, Zhu P. The relationship between environmental accounting disclosure and financial performance and heterogeneity analysis: evidence from Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. International Journal of Accounting and Finance Reporting. 2025; 15(2): 47–68. doi: 10.5296/ijafr.v15i2.22875

68.    Wang X, Zhang Z, Chun D. The influencing mechanism of internal control effectiveness on technological innovation: CSR as a mediator. Sustainability. 2021; 13(23): 13122. doi: 10.3390/su132313122

69.    Haryanto H, Suharman H, Koeswayo PS, Umar H. Does internal control promote employee engagement drivers? A systematic literature review. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 2023; 17(4): 192–203. doi: 10.14453/aabfj.v17i4.12

70.    Yoon I, Lee H, Choi D, et al. Quantitative and qualitative investments in internal control personnel and firm operational efficiency: Evidence from Korea. Investment Management & Financial Innovations. 2023; 20(3): 273. doi: 10.21511/imfi.20(3).2023.23

71.    IFRS S. General requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. Sustainability Disclosure Standard. International Sustainability Standards Board; 2023.

72.    Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Using the COSO Framework to Establish Internal Controls Over Sustainability Reporting (ICSR); 2023.

73.    Yang L, Qin H, Gan Q, et al. Internal control quality, enterprise environmental protection investment and finance performance: An empirical study of China’s A-share heavy pollution industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(17): 6082. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176082

74.    Hoai TT, Nguyen NP. Internal control systems and performance of emerging market firms: The moderating roles of leadership consistency and quality. SAGE Open. 2022; 12(3): 21582440221123509. doi: 10.1177/21582440221123509

75.    Hajiani H, Afshari MH, Rezaei M. Identifying and evaluating a model for enhancing the assessment of internal controls and accounting systems. Business, Marketing, and Finance Open. 2024; 1(4): 14–24. doi:

76.    Tao L, Wei X, Wang W. Does enterprise internal control improve environmental performance—empirical evidence from China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(13): 10199. doi: 10.3390/su151310199

77.    Ning WU, Kao-dui LI, Guo-dong LI. Internal control, marketization process and corporate risk-taking. Commercial Research. 2015; 57(7): 144. doi:

78.    Zhu D, Gao X, Luo Z, Xu W. Environmental performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2022; 74: 101811. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101811

79.    Kroes J, Subramanian R, Subramanyam R. On the link between environmental and market performance under market-based environmental regulation. SSRN; 2008.

80.    Gangi F, Daniele LM, Varrone N. How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk-adjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment. 2020; 29(5): 1975–1991. doi: 10.1002/bse.2482

81.    Delmas MA, Pekovic S. Environmental standards and labor productivity: Understanding the mechanisms that sustain sustainability. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2013; 34(2): 230–252. doi: 10.1002/job.1827

82.    Shanghai Huazheng Index Information Service Co Ltd. ESG stock rating data. Available online: https://www.chindices.com/files/Sino-Securities+Index+ESG+Ratings+Methodology+V2.1.pdf (accessed on 18 March 2026)

83.    Atan R, Alam MM, Said J, et al. The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2018; 29(2): 182–194. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033

84.    Naeem N, Cankaya S, Bildik R. Does ESG performance affect the financial performance of environmentally sensitive industries? A comparison between emerging and developed markets. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022; 22: S128–S140. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.014

85.    Fu T, Li J. An empirical analysis of the impact of ESG on financial performance: The moderating role of digital transformation. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 11: 1256052. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1256052

86.    Aydoğmuş M, Gülay G, Ergun K. Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022; 22: S119–S127. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

87.    Tobin J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1969; 1(1): 15–29. doi: 10.2307/1991374

88.    Singh S, Tabassum N, Darwish TK, et al. Corporate governance and Tobin’s Q as a measure of organizational performance. British Journal of Management. 2018; 29(1): 171–190. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12237

89.    Kaplan R S, Norton D P. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review; 2005.

90.    Huang R, Huang Y. Does internal control contribute to a firm’s green information disclosure? Evidence from China. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8): 3197. doi: 10.3390/su12083197

91.    Chan KC, Chen Y, Liu B. The linear and non-linear effects of internal control and its five components on corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese firms using the COSO framework. European Accounting Review. 2021; 30(4): 733–765. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1776626

92.    Wu X, Zeng S. R&D investment, internal control and enterprise performance—an empirical study based on the listed companies in China of the core industry of the digital economy. Sustainability. 2022; 14(24): 16700. doi: 10.3390/su142416700

93.    Wu L, Zhai Z, Lv Y. A cross-cultural study of ESG impact on corporate performance and equity. Accounting & Finance. 2024; 64(5): 4771–4788. doi: 10.1111/acfi.13345

94.    Jiang W. Corporate ESG performance, information transparency and financial performance. Finance. 2024; 14(3): 763–776. doi: 10.12677/fin.2024.143081

95.    Acharya VV, Myers SC, Rajan RG. The internal governance of firms. The Journal of Finance. 2011; 66(3): 689–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01649.x

96.    Chen SS, Chen IJ. Corporate governance and capital allocations of diversified firms. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2012; 36(2): 395–409. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.07.013

97.    Lin MF, Yu P. The association between earnings persistence and internal control quality: Evidence from China. Journal of Finance and Economics. 2015; 3(4): 38–68. doi: 10.12735/jfe.v3i4p38

98.    Guo Y, Hong Y. How does ESG information disclosure affect corporate total factor productivity? Evidence from A-share listed companies (Chinese). Wuhan Finance. 2023; (7): 13–22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3540.2023.07.002
Neyestani B. Effects of ISO 9001 standard on critical factors of project management in construction industry. 2017: 23–24. doi: 10.17758/URUAE.AE011750353

99.    Li X, Liu Y, Saat MM. ESG and firm value: Unlocking thes= power of internal control. Journal of Contemporary Management Studies. 2025; 1(1): 34–45. doi: 10.11113/

100. Hammersley JS, Myers LA, Shakespeare C. Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Review of Accounting Studies. 2008; 13(1): 141–165. doi: 10.1007/s11142-007-9046-z

101. Li Y, Yu J, Zhang Z, et al. The effect of internal control weakness on firm valuation: evidence from SOX Section 404 disclosures. Finance Research Letters. 2016; 17: 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.01.001

102. Ashbaugh-Skaife H, Collins DW, Kinney WR Jr. The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 2007; 44(1–2): 166–192.

103. Lobo G, Wang C, Yu X, et al. Material weakness in internal controls and stock price crash risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 2020; 35(1): 106–138. doi: 10.1177/0148558X17696761

104. Vuong NB. Investor sentiment, corporate social responsibility, and financial performance: evidence from Japanese companies. Borsa Istanbul Review. 2022; 22(5): 911–924. doi: 10.1016/j.bir.2022.06.010

105. Fang L, Guo X. From responsibility to value: ESG and long-term corporate value. PLoS One. 2025; 20(4): e0322018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322018

106. Baugh M, Ege MS, Yust CG. Internal control quality and bank risk-taking and performance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 2021; 40(2): 49–84. doi: 10.2308/AJPT-19-037

107. Imdieke AJ, Li C, Zhou S. Does the presence of an internal control audit affect firm operational efficiency? Contemporary Accounting Research. 2023; 40(2): 952–980. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12839

108. Qiu D, Jiao Y, Yeoh W, et al. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Bigdata Blockchain and Economy Management (ICBBEM 2022). Vol 5. Springer Nature; 2022.

109. Asare E, Owusu-Manu DG, Ayarkwa J, et al. Thematic literature review of working capital management in the construction industry: trends and research opportunities. Construction Innovation. 2023; 23(4): 775–791. doi: 10.1108/CI-09-2021-0177

110. Lutz J. Committee of sponsoring organizations of the treadway commission: Internal control; integrated framework mit besonderer berücksichtigung der änderungen in der neuauflage 2013. 2014.

111. Xiao-Lin H, Chen G. Internal control and corporate performance: industry clustering analysis and an empirical test based on Chinese listed companies. Huadong Shifan Daxue Xuebao Ziran Kexue Ban. 2017; 49(2): 173. doi: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5579.2017.02.018

112. Han S, Lau YW, Saidin SF. Corporate ESG disclosure in agribusiness: Effects on market value and investor behavior. Research on World Agricultural Economy. 2026; 7(1): 377–399. doi: 10.36956/rwae.v7i1.2631

113. Ma X, Ock YS, Wu F, Zhang Z. The effect of internal control on green innovation: Corporate environmental investment as a mediator. Sustainability. 2022; 14(3): 1755. doi: 10.3390/su14031755

114. Zhang J, Liu Z. Study on the impact of corporate ESG performance on green innovation performance—evidence from listed companies in China A-shares. Sustainability. 2023; 15(20): 14750. doi: 10.3390/su152014750

115. Alnor NHA. Corporate governance characteristics and environmental sustainability affect the business performance among listed Saudi company. Sustainability. 2024; 16(19): 8436. doi: 10.3390/su16198436

116. Abozaid EM, Shehab LS, Alnor NHA, et al. Do corporate risks and profitability affect sustainability disclosure? Evidence from the Saudi business environment. WSEAS Trans Bus Econ. 2025; 22: 1393–1404. doi: 10.37394/23207.2025.22.113

117. Peng Y, Zhang Q, Yan H, et al. Short-term relief or long-term risk? The impact of financial asset allocation on corporate risk in China’s construction and manufacturing firms. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2025: 1–14. doi: 10.1080/13467581.2025.2527978

118. Ma S, Yan H, Yang Y, et al. Does water pollution truly erode corporate ESG performance? Evidence from China. Evidence from China. Water Economics and Policy. 2026: 2650003. doi: 10.1142/S2382624X26500037

119. Ma S, Liu H, Zeng H, et al. From loom to algorithm: how digital technologies drive quality development in the textile sector. The Journal of The Textile Institute. 2026: 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2026.2622882