
Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Low-carbon tourism resilience and destination loyalty: The roles of failure factors, communication quality, and tourist satisfaction
Vol 4, Issue 3, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract
Sustainable tourism has emerged as an important approach in achieving a harmonious balance between economic development and environmental protection in destinations following low carbon development approaches. This study explores the working mechanism of resilient low carbon tourism destinations through exploring failure management, infrastructure resilience, low carbon practices, and communication quality at major destinations in Thailand, such as Bangkok, Phuket, and Chiang Mai. The study made use of an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach whereby quantitative data was first collected from 602 tourists and followed by an interpretative approach using semi-structured interviews conducted among 30 individuals. The results of structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis show that low carbon practices, infrastructure resilience, and communication quality positively affect tourist satisfaction, while perceived failure dimensions have an adverse impact on satisfaction and destination loyalty indirectly. In particular, the qualitative phase focused on providing explanations related to the findings of SEM analysis with special attention paid to tourist perception and experience of implemented strategies aimed at enhancing resilience and sustainability at tourist destinations. Thematic analysis of interview data allowed the emergence of several themes, including perceived failures of services and the environment, low carbon adaptation, infrastructure resilience, and open communication promoting trust and loyalty.
Keywords
References
1. Seraj M, Ike OC, Ozdeser H. The contribution of tourism to GDP growth and sustainable tourism development in Africa. Future Business Journal. 2025; 11(1): 115. doi: 10.1186/s43093-025-00532-8
2. Alexandre R, Diaz MD. Tourism receipts, employment, and infrastructure: Drivers of Brazil’s economic growth. Journal of Policy Options. 2025; 8(3): 45–55. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17315176
3. Petrosillo I, Zurlini G, Grato E, Zaccarelli N. Indicating the fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems. Ecological Indicators. 2006; 6(1): 104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.008
4. Tu J, Luo S, Yang et al. Spatiotemporal evolution and the influencing factors of tourism-based social-ecological system vulnerability in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Sustainability. 2021; 13(7): 4008. doi: 10.3390/su13074008
5. Holden A. Local tourism governance: Issues of equity and justice in the use of nature. In: Tourism Governance in the Anthropocene. 2025: 11–31. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-95697-3_2
6. Carreira H, Ferreira JJ. Environmental resilience and carbon neutrality: A systematic and integrative review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 2025: 1–29. doi: 10.1108/MEQ-06-2025-0404
7. Guo Y, Li S. Multi-level governance of low-carbon tourism in rural China: Policy evolution, implementation pathways, and socio-ecological impacts. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2025; 12: 1482713. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1482713
8. Zhang J. Determinants of tourism enterprises’ low-carbon transition: Seen from the strategy tripod perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2025: 1–28. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2025.2573702
9. Zhu Y, Chai S, Chen J, Phau I. How was rural tourism developed in China? examining the impact of China’s evolving rural tourism policies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024; 26(11): 28945–28969. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03850-5
10. Wang X, Zhang M, Jie S, et al. Exploring the coordinated evolution mechanism of regional sustainable development and tourism in China’s “Beautiful China” initiative. Land. 2023; 12(5): 1003. doi: 10.3390/land12051003
11. Peeters P, Eijgelaar E. Low-carbon tourism. In: Encyclopedia of Tourism. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025: 626–627. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01384-8_278
12. Kusumah EP. Sustainable tourism concept: Tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty. International Journal of Tourism Cities. 2024; 10(1): 166–184. doi: 10.1108/ijtc-04-2023-0074
13. Grigoriadis P, Salepaki A, Angelou I, Kourkouridis D. Risk and resilience in tourism: how political instability and social conditions influence destination choices. Tourism and Hospitality. 2025; 6(2): 83. doi: 10.3390/tourhosp6020083
14. Schweiggart N, Shah AM, Qayyum A, Jamil RA. Navigating negative experiences: how do they influence tourists’ psychological and behavioural responses to tourism service failures on social media? Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 2025; 30(6): 786–808. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2025.2471492
15. Chen CF, Chen FS. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Tourism Management. 2010; 31(1): 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
16. Chen X, Cheng ZF. The impact of environment-friendly short videos on consumers’ low-carbon tourism behavioural intention: A communicative ecology theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1137716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137716
17. Lee TH, Jan FH, Yang CC. Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors. Tourism Management. 2013; 36: 454–468. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.012
18. Han H, Yu J, Kim W. Youth travelers and waste reduction behaviors while traveling to tourist destinations. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2018; 35(9): 1119–1131. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2018.1435335.
19. Platania M. Resilience frameworks in tourism studies: A literature review. Turistica-Italian Journal of Tourism. 2023; 32(1): 1–44. doi: 10.70732/tijt.v32i1.16
20. Prayag G. Symbiotic relationship or not? Understanding resilience and crisis management. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2018; 25: 133–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2017.11.012
21. Becken S. Decarbonising tourism: mission impossible? Tourism Recreation Research. 2019; 44(4): 419–433.
22. Liang L, Peng KL. The influence of the carbon neutrality goal on tourists’ low-carbon tourism behavior intention in space tourism. Explora: Environment and Resource. 2025; 2(1): 3655. doi: 10.36922/eer.3655
23. Bhat MA. Tourism service quality: A dimension-specific assessment of SERVQUAL. Global Business Review. 2012; 13(2): 327–337. doi: 10.1177/097215091201300210
24. Kim H, Fesenmaier DR. Persuasive design of destination web sites: An analysis of first impression. Journal of Travel Research. 2008; 47(1): 3–13. doi: 10.1177/0047287507312405
25. Oliver RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research. 1980; 17(4): 460–469. doi: 10.1177/002224378001700405
26. Chen CF, Chen FS. Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Tourism Management. 2010; 31(1): 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
27. Yoon Y, Uysal M. An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty. Tourism Management. 2005; 26(1): 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2003.08.016
28. Prayag G, Ryan C. Antecedents of tourists’ loyalty to Mauritius: The role and influence of destination image, place attachment, personal involvement, and satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research. 2012; 51(3): 342–356. doi: 10.1177/0047287511410321
29. Hu Y, Xu S. Repeat tourists’ perceived unfavourable changes and their effects on destination loyalty. Tourism Review. 2023; 78(1): 42–57. doi: 10.1108/TR-05-2022-0235
30. Phi LN, Phuong DH, Huy TV. How perceived crowding changes the interrelationships between perceived value, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: The empirical study at Hoi An. International Journal of Tourism Cities. 2024; 10(1): 324–352. doi: 10.1108/IJTC-08-2023-0155
31. Janchai N, Suvittawat A. The structural equation model of factors affecting decision-making on low-carbon tourist destinations. Sustainability. 2025; 17(5): 2082. doi: 10.3390/su17052082
32. Wei C, Zhang T. Authenticity and quality of industrial heritage are the drivers of tourists’ loyalty and environmentally responsible behavior. Sustainability. 2023; 15(11): 8791. doi: 10.3390/su15118791
33. Nguyen HKT, Tran PTK, Tran VT. The relationships among social media communication, brand equity and satisfaction in a tourism destination: the case of Danang city, Vietnam. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. 2024; 7(2): 1187–1210. doi: 10.1108/jhti-11-2022-0567
34. Arabacıoğlu D, Dedeoglu BB. The moderating role of information quality in the relationship between guides’ communication skills and tour satisfaction. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism. 2025; 26(4): 813–832. doi: 10.1080/1528008X.2023.2264510
35. Sangperm N, Pungpho K. Exploring the nexus between bonding, communication, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: A case of higher education institutes in Thailand. Asian Administration & Management Review. 2020; 3(2): 25–38. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3888066
36. Sriboonlue U. The effects of cultural dimensions on service quality, customer engagement, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty in multi-national airline sectors. Asian Administration & Management Review. 2022; 5(2): 12–23.
37. Panthurat M, Chimpleewat K, Lalaeng C. driving tourist intentions via creative tourism, service marketing, and destination attachment. Asian Interdisciplinary and Sustainability Review. 2026; 15(1): 4–4. doi: 10.14456/aisr.2026.4
Supporting Agencies
Copyright (c) 2026 Warach Madhyamapurush

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Prof. Kittisak Wongmahesak
North Bangkok University (Thailand)





It is with deep regret that we announce the cancellation of the Forum on Sustainable Social Development & Computing and Artificial Intelligence, originally scheduled for June 15, 2025.
