Communication process and tourism branding through the tourist destination policy under the green tourism promotion strategy in Thailand during the COVID-19 pandemic situation

Teerati Banterng, Apichaya Tipmonthien, Vinijphat Kanyapon

Article ID: 8505
Vol 4, Issue 4, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23812/ssd8505

Download PDF

Abstract

What does it mean for a national government to communicate green tourism, and for whom does that communication actually work? This study takes up these questions through a retrospective qualitative case study of Thailand’s Green Tourism Promotion Strategy (2017–2021) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on policy document analysis, semi-structured interviews with nine government officials, and four focus group discussions involving 20 tourism stakeholders, the study examines how different actor groups, policymakers, tourism businesses, and the general public, understood and responded to sustainability-framed communication about destinations in Thailand. The findings show that government officials and senior policy practitioners consistently framed green tourism within a holistic sustainability agenda, whereas local business owners and tourists typically understood it in narrower terms, principally as environmental protection, waste reduction, or nature-based experience. Moreover, digital platforms proved indispensable during the pandemic, sustaining destination visibility and circulating messages about responsible travel; yet the reach of this communication was uneven, and the alignment it was supposed to produce was largely absent. On this basis, the study argues that green tourism destination branding in Thailand needs to be reconceptualized: not as a message transmitted downward from policy to public, but as a shared meaning constructed through more inclusive, segmented, and culturally grounded communication, one that actively involves local intermediaries and bridges the gap between official sustainability rhetoric and lived tourism practice.


Keywords

policy communication; green tourism; destination branding; COVID-19; Thailand


References

1.         Aguinis H, Kraus S, Pocek J, et al. The why, how, and what of public policy implications of tourism and hospitality research. Tourism Management. 2023; 97: 104720. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104720

2.         Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. National economic and social development plan 12th edition 2017–2021. 2017. Available online: https://www.nesdc.go.th/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/article_20191119144322.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2026).

3.         National Economic and Social Development Council. Phaen mae bot phaitai yutthasat chat praden (05) kan thongthieo (translator) [Master plan under the national strategy, issue 05: Tourism]. Available online: https://www.nesdc.go.th/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/05-NS64-05.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2026).

4.         United Nations. History: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 2 March 2026).

5.         Ministry of Tourism and Sports. Green Tourism Promotion Strategy (2017-2021). 2017. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20220805160527/https://www.mots.go.th/download/PolicyStrategy/StrategyPromotingGreenTourism.pdf (accessed on 16 March 2026).

6.         Wang Y, Pizam A. Destination marketing and management: theories and applications. Cambridge: CAB International; 2011.

7.         Kozak M, Decrop A. Handbook of tourist behavior: theory and practice. New York: Routledge; 2009.

8.         Ruimai N. Communications images: Sustainable expansion of foreign tourism market. Journal of Rajanagarindra. 2022; 19(1): 33–41.

9.         Bounpathaph L, Untong A, Tavonmongkolkij V. Components of destination image, overall satisfaction and behavioral intention of Lao tourists traveling to Luang Prabang during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Liberal Arts. 2022; 10(1): 248–264.

10.      Chi CGQ, Qu H. Examining the structural relationships of destination image, tourist satisfaction and destination loyalty: an integrated approach. Tourism Management. 2008; 29(4): 624–636. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.06.007

11.      Frey N, George R. Responsible tourism management: the missing link between business owners’ attitudes and behaviour in the Cape Town tourism industry. Tourism Management. 2010; 31(5): 621–628. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.017

12.      Confetto MG, Conte F, Palazzo M, Siano A. Digital destination branding: A framework to define and assess European DMOs practices. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2023; 30: 100804. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100804

13.      Kusumaningrum SD, Wikurendra EA, Marhadi M. How can sustainability add value in destination marketing? The tourist perspective. Cogent Business & Management. 2024; 11(1): 2425718. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2024.2425718

14.      Smit B, Melissen F, Font X, Dickinger A. Destination design: identifying three key co-design strategies. Current Issues in Tourism. 2024; 27(24): 4791–4806. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2332495

15.      Zhang H, Lin Z, Li S. The effect of destination brand love on environmentally responsible behavior: A comparison between tourists and residents. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2025; 33(8): 1615–1633. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2024.2397644

16.      Majeed S, Zhou Z, Kim WG. Destination brand image and destination brand choice in the context of health crisis: Scale development. Tourism and Hospitality Research. 2024; 24(1): 134–151. doi: 10.1177/14673584221126798

17.      Gotham KF, Lewis JA. Green tourism and the ambiguities of sustainability discourse: the case of New Orleans’s Lower Ninth Ward. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development. 2015; 6(2): 57–73. doi: 10.4018/ijsesd.2015040104

18.      Taecharungroj V, Pattaratanakun A. Responding to an unprecedented shock-Elucidating how 113 DMOs changed the marketing communications on Twitter during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2023; 30: 100819. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100819

19.      Pachucki C, Grohs R, Scholl-Grissemann U. Is nothing like before? COVID-19-evoked changes to tourism destination social media communication. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2022; 23: 100692. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2022.100692 

20.      Mongkolchart P, Sridee S, Boonsiri K. Communication process to promote culture tourism and Saba Tossing Game (Len Saba Traditional Game) in the Songkran Festival of Mon people in Phra Pradaeng District, Samut Prakarn Province. Journal of Liberal Art of Rajamangala University of Technology Suvarnabhumi. 2021; 3(3): 399–413.

21.      Saeho K. Tourism image, service quality image, and tourism values affecting sustainable tourism attitudes: case study of nature-based tourism of Thai working-age tourists in Bangkok. Master’s thesis. Bangkok: Bangkok University; 2017.

22.      Aziz S, Niazi MAK. Protecting natural environment of destination through tourists’ environment responsible behavior: Empirical analysis of green brand equity model. Social Responsibility Journal. 2025; 21(4): 704–724. doi: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2024-0628

23.      Strandberg C, Styvén ME. The multidimensionality of place identity: A systematic concept analysis and framework of place-related identity elements. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2024; 95: 102257. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102257

24.      Chen T, Liu G, Sui X, Solangi YA. Influencing consumer perceptions in green tourism: criteria and strategies for effective destination branding. PLOS ONE. 2025; 20(2): e0319254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319254

25.      Ezzatian S, Toghraee MT, Torabi Farsani N. Branding tourism destinations in the metaverse: Insights from professionals and researchers. Journal of Tourism Futures. 2025. doi: 10.1108/JTF-08-2024-0176

26.      Bakker W. The Destination Management and Marketing Model Part 1: Introduction. 2014. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20250917181348/https://destinationthink.com/blog/our-destination-marketing-and-management-model/ (accessed on 16 March 2026).

27.      Chaivichayachat B. Evaluation of policy promoting tourism in Thailand. Journal of Thai Hospitality & Tourism. 2018; 13(2): 91–106.

28.      Afaq A, Gaur L, Singh G, Erben M, Ferraris A. A critical insight into the intersection of sustainability and technology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2025; 37(1): 239–259. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-02-2024-0188

29.      Vithayaporn S. COVID-19 pandemic - a testing time for tourism and hospitality in Thailand. ABAC ODI Journal Vision.Action.Outcome. 2021; 8(1): 41–53.

30.      Fakfare P, Lee J, Han H. Thailand tourism: A systematic review. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2022; 39(2): 188–214. doi: 10.1080/10548408.2022.2061674

31.      Dai S, Zhang P, Li S, Xu H. Environmental communication in wildlife tourism: Narrative framing and emotion effect on the willingness to pay for a destination. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2025; 33(7): 1476–1492. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2024.2382432

32.      Azam M, Sarker T. Governance of green tourism and sustainable development: towards greening the economy. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 2011; 1: 6–15.

33.      Krungthep Turakij. Open statistics for “foreigners traveling to Thailand” 1 Jan - 15 Jun 2022, recovering 1.6 million people, recovering the economy by 3,895%. 2022. Available online: https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/1010641 (accessed on 16 March 2026).

34.      Alonso-Muñoz S, Torrejon-Ramos M, Medina-Salgado M, Gonzalez-Sanchez R. Sustainability as a building block for tourism – future research: Tourism agenda 2030. Tourism Review. 2023; 78(2): 461–474. doi: 10.1108/TR-12-2021-0568

35.      Dangi TB, Jamal T. An integrated approach to “sustainable community-based tourism”. Sustainability. 2016; 8(5): 475. doi: 10.3390/su8050475

36.      Buluk Eşitti B. The impact of coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic: Digital transformation changes in tourism. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research. 2023; 9(1): 15–23. doi: 10.24288/jttr.1205828

37.      El Gamil R. Exploring travel behaviour post-COVID-19: towards a more responsible tourism. Academica Turistica – Tourism and Innovation Journal. 2022; 15(2): 203–216. doi: 10.26493/2335-4194.15.203-216

38.      Kovačić S, Cimbaljević M, Tretyakova TN, et al. How has COVID-19 changed the way we travel? exploring tourist personality, reactions to the perceived risk and change in travel behavior. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3): 1951. doi: 10.3390/su15031951

39.      Dekhili S, Achabou MA. The perception of ecotourism: Semantic profusion and tourists’ expectations. Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise (RIMHE). 2015; 3(19): 3–20. http://doi.org/10.3917/rimhe.019.0003

40.      Guo Y, Jiang J, Li S. A sustainable tourism policy research review. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11): 3187. doi: 10.3390/su11113187

41.      Mihalic T. Trends in sustainable tourism paradigm: resilience and adaptation. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17): 7838. doi: 10.3390/su16177838

42.      Weber AS. Disambiguation of the terminology of sustainable tourism and ecotourism. In: Rocha Á, Montenegro C, Pereira ET, Victor JAM, Ibarra W, editors. Management, Tourism and Smart Technologies. ICMTT 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer; 2024; 1191. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-74828-8_40

43.      Elliott J. Government management of tourism - a Thai case study. Tourism Management. 1987; 8(3): 223–232. doi: 10.1016/0261-5177(87)90054-9

44.      Jarvis N, Weeden C, Simcock N. The benefits and challenges of sustainable tourism certification: A case study of the green tourism business scheme in the West of England. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2010; 17(1): 83–93. doi: 10.1375/jhtm.17.1.83

45.      Firman A, Moslehpour M, Qiu R, et al. The impact of eco-innovation, ecotourism policy and social media on sustainable tourism development: evidence from the tourism sector of Indonesia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2023; 36(2): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2143847

46.      Siriwattana S. The efficiency of tourism organization management using digital technology. Journal of MCU Social Development. 2023; 7(3): 405–424.

Supporting Agencies

Research Fund of the National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA), Thailand



Copyright (c) 2026 Teerati Banterng, Apichaya Tipmonthien, Vinijphat Kanyapong

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).