Cultural heritage, contemporary art, and sustainable social development in restaurant spaces: A comparative study of Kunming and Bangkok

Liang Du, Thongchue Khiatthong

Article ID: 8798
Vol 4, Issue 4, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.23812/ssd8798

Download PDF

Abstract

Cultural heritage is increasingly incorporated into commercial environments as a means of strengthening local identity and encouraging public engagement with cultural traditions. Restaurant spaces provide an important setting in which heritage can be interpreted through contemporary artistic practices while remaining closely connected to everyday urban life. This study comparatively examines how local cultural heritage is represented through contemporary art in selected restaurants in Kunming, China, and Bangkok, Thailand, and explores its contribution to spatial identity, cultural communication, and sustainable social development. A qualitative comparative case study involving ten restaurants was undertaken using field observations, visual documentation, semi-structured interviews, and thematic analysis, supported by visitor perception questionnaires as contextual evidence. The findings reveal that heritage resources are reinterpreted through architectural references, symbolic artifacts, decorative installations, and immersive spatial experiences. Restaurants in Kunming mainly emphasize ethnic diversity and historical narratives, whereas those in Bangkok draw more extensively upon Buddhist symbolism, community traditions, and everyday cultural practices. Although the artistic approaches differ, both contexts demonstrate how commercial environments can facilitate cultural communication and reinforce community identity. Based on these findings, the study proposes a comparative framework explaining the relationships among heritage resources, artistic interpretation, spatial identity, cultural sustainability, and sustainable social development. The proposed framework offers a useful perspective for understanding heritage-based artistic applications in contemporary restaurant environments and provides implications for future cultural design and heritage interpretation.


Keywords

cultural heritage, contemporary art, sustainable social development, cultural sustainability, spatial identity, cultural communication


References

1.          Fajarwati AAS. Adaptive reuse of Pos Bloc and M Bloc: The intersection of third place, nostalgia, and circular economy. Humaniora. 2023; 14: 215–222. doi: 10.21512/humaniora.v14i3.9688

2.          Gao Y, Pitts A. The ancient southern silk road and the contemporary one belt and one road in southwest China case study of Kunming city in Yunnan province. 2022; 1: 177–182. doi: 10.5117/9789048557820/icas.2022.021

3.          Moser G, Guerra JBSO de A, Nunes NA, Francisco THA. Planning and management in cultural preservation and sustainable development in urban contexts. Concilium. 2024; 24: 237–252. doi: 10.53660/clm-3065-24e28

4.          Karadeniz CB, Güney M, Mertol H. Perspectives on cultural heritage, place, and meaning within historical and cultural geography. Veredas do Direito Direito Ambiental e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. 2026; 23: e235144–e235144. doi:10.18623/rvd.v23.5144

5.          Sepe M. Planning and Place in the City. Routledge; 2013. doi:10.4324/9780203076149

6.          Hong Y, Srijinda P. Empirical study on the influencing factors of cultural space communication effect in Lou Di City. Journal of Ecohumanism. 2024; 3(7). doi:10.62754/joe.v3i7.4654

7.          Cheng W, Niu CY, Huang L, Zhang Y. Design strategies for culinary heritage restaurants from a cultural sustainability perspective: Focusing on generation Z consumers. Sustainability. 2025; 17(8): 3401. doi: 10.3390/su17083401

8.          Kavitha K, Ravi GR. Culinary heritage as a sustainable tourism product. In: Advances in hospitality, tourism and the services industry (AHTSI). IGI Global; 2024. pp. 60–76. doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4135-3.ch004

9.          Moroojo A W, Raza A, Na H, et al. Sustainability business strategies: contributing to business success through resilience-sustainable efforts. Strategies and approaches of corporate social responsibility toward multinational enterprises. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; 2024. pp. 263–296. doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0363-4.ch015

10.       Krivolap A. Creative industries as platform for citizen participation in cultural transformation of Minsk urban space. Studia Humanistyczne/Studia Humanistyczne AGH. 2022; 21: 37–50. doi: 10.7494/human.2022.21.4.37

11.       Pérez GAJ, de la Cruz JMH, Villasante AGP. La comunidad residente en los espacios públicos urbanos y su patrimonio. Región Científica. 2025; 4(2): 2024484–2024484. doi: 10.58763/rc2025484

12.       Economou M, Young H, Sosnowska E. Digital storytelling for emotional engagement in museums: Design and evaluation of the Hunterian Antonine Wall EMOTIVE experiences. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2025; 32: 324–55. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2025.2591613

13.       Щербина ВМ. Contemporary art and problems of preserving cultural memory. Contemporary Art. 2025; 21: 9–20. doi: 10.31500/2309-8813.21.2025.345517

14.       Bo L, Rani MFA. The value of current sense of place in architectural heritage studies: A systematic review. Buildings. 2025; 15: 903–903. doi: 10.3390/buildings15060903

15.       Lei H, Zhou Y. Conducting heritage tourism-led urban renewal in Chinese historical and cultural urban spaces: A case study of Datong. Land. 2022; 11: 2122–2122. doi: 10.3390/land11122122

16.       Caja-Corrales Y, Medina-Gamero A, Guillen-Rojas N, Cordova-Buiza F. Gastronomy, memory and resistance: Cultural approaches to the gentrification of traditional Peruvian cuisine. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites. 2025; 63: 2897–906. doi: 10.30892/gtg.634spl34-1649

17.       Kristina A. East Javanese themed interior design of hallo Surabaya Kertajaya restaurant for cultural preservation. Serat Rupa Journal of Design. 2026; 10: 95–112. doi: 10.28932/srjd.v10i1.12747

18.       Vlase I, Lähdesmäki T. A bibliometric analysis of cultural heritage research in the humanities: The web of science as a tool of knowledge management. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023; 10(1): 84. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01582-5

19.       Lam JFI, Ong C, Wu T, et al. The right to entrepreneurial expression over heritage significance: The micropolitics of an adapted cafe in a historic Chinese town. Built Heritage. 2022; 6(1): 26. doi: 10.1186/s43238-022-00076-8

20.       Li J, Krishnamurthy S, Roders AP, Wesemael P van. Community participation in cultural heritage management: A systematic literature review comparing Chinese and international practices. Cities. 2019; 96: 102476–102476. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102476

21.       Xiao J, Stark A, Yusuff NA, et al. An ethnographic observation on the culture of ethnic minorities in Yunnan: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices. 2024; 7: 45–52. doi:10.35631/ijemp.725005

22.       Fu CX, Mao Z, Zhang Q, et al. Beyond surplus: A review of cultural, ecological, and technological drivers of sustainable tea development in Yunnan, CHINA. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2025; 23: 10051–10073. doi: 10.15666/aeer/2305_1005110073

23.       Yi C. Integrating dai ethnic cultural elements into contemporary hotel space design: A case study of the Anantara resort Xishuangbanna. Highlights in Art and Design. 2025; 12: 60–72. doi:10.54097/wevwkb26

24.       Jhearmaneechotechai P. Ordinary Urban Heritage of Rattanakosin: Ordinary restaurants and everyday foods of the historic center of Bangkok. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2023; 13: 335–348. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.11.006

25.       Noparatnaraporn C. Reading the present day Bangkok: Changing attitudes to meanings of place. University of Melbourne, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning; 2005.

26.       Yodsurang P, Miki H, Uekita Y. A traditional community in the chao Phraya river basin: Classification and characteristics of a waterfront community complex. Asian Culture and History. 2015; 8: 57–57. doi: 10.5539/ach.v8n1p57

27.       Phongpheng V, Chongstitvatana S. Civilized Bangkok in globalization: The representation of Bangkok in official tourist guides, 1998–2013. 2015. doi:10.58837/chula.the.2015.1826

28.       Aggarwal N, Wason R, Arora P, et al. 3C Tecnología_Glosas de innovación aplicadas a lapyme. 2023; 12. doi: 10.17993/3ctecno.2023.v12n2e44

29.       Li C, Qian Y, Li Z, Tong T. Identifying factors influencing the spatial distribution of minority cultural heritage in Southwest China. Heritage Science. 2024; 12(1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40494-024-01230-4

30.       Aruninta A, Matsushima H, Phukumchai P. Flow or fence: Learning, preserving, and redefining the riverfront cultural landscape. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. 2020; 12: 921–933. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2020.1211054

31.       Morita A. From gravitational machine to universal habitat: The drainage basin and amphibious futures in the Chao Phraya Delta, Thailand. Engaging Science Technology and Society. 2017; 3: 259. doi: 10.17351/ests2017.57

32.       Yue D, Seekhunlio W. The study of knowledge and preservation of Songming lantern opera in Kunming, Yunnan province, China. Multidisciplinary Science Journal. 2023; 6: 2024050–2024050. doi: 10.31893/multiscience.2024050

33.       Gao G. Research of methods of analysis and visual transmission of cultural heritage in the design of the city brand. Культура и искусство. 2025; 7: 32–48. doi: 10.7256/2454-0625.2025.7.75110

34.       Nursanty E, Hassan RA, Prastyadewi MI. Navigating the tension between city branding and authenticity: A conceptual framework. Journal of City Branding and Authenticity. 2023; 1. doi: 10.61511/jcbau.v1i1.2023.20

35.       Peng Y. Understanding the cultural identity of EFL learners from the eco-linguistics perspective: Evidence from students in arts college before and after the COVID-19 epidemic period. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023; 14: 1249334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249334

36.       Yin Z, Ardsmiti N. Cultural identity and glocalization—A case study of Thai restaurants in Kunming. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies. 2024; 24(2): 364–379. doi: 10.69598/hasss.24.2.265532

37.       Herzfeld M. The blight of beautification: Bangkok and the pursuit of class-based urban purity. Journal of Urban Design. 2017; 22: 291–307. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2017.1294976

38.       Chen Y. How to improve the integrity and sustainability of historic architectural complexes and their environments in modern urban planning--an example from the “Wenming Street” historic district renovation project in Kunming. Applied and Computational Engineering. 2023; 10: 289–296. doi: 10.54254/2755-2721/10/20230008

39.       Wen Y, Haider SA, Boukhris M. Preserving the past, nurturing the future: A systematic literature review on the conservation and revitalization of Chinese historical town environments during modernization. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023; 11: 1114697. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1114697

40.       Herzfeld M. When resilience becomes tangible: The social and political challenges to local self-expression in Thailand and Elsewhere. 2025; 33–56. doi: 10.5117/9789463728560_ch02

41.       Pappa D, Makropoulos C. Novel ways of discovering, capturing and experiencing cultural heritage: A review of current state-of-the-art, challenges and future directions. IntechOpen eBooks. 2021. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.99170

42.       Kosmii M, Grebeniuk I. The influence of intangible factors on the formation of urban spatial identity within the city structure. Municipal economy of cities. 2026; 74–74. doi: 10.33042/3083-6727-2026-1-196-74-81

43.       Liu R, Gao W, Yang F. Authenticity, integrity, and cultural–ecological adaptability in heritage conservation: A practical framework for historic urban areas—A case study of Yicheng Ancient City, China. Buildings. 2025; 15: 1304–1304. doi: 10.3390/buildings15081304

44.       MacCannell, D., Dean. Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American journal of Sociology. 1973; 79.3: 589–603. doi: 10.1086/225585

Supporting Agencies



Copyright (c) 2026 Liang Du, Thongchue Khiatthong

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).