Asia Pacific Academy of Science Pte. Ltd. (APACSCI) specializes in international journal publishing. APACSCI adopts the open access publishing model and provides an important communication bridge for academic groups whose interest fields include engineering, technology, medicine, computer, mathematics, agriculture and forestry, and environment.
Beyond technological mandates: Innovation capacity, bureaucratic resistance, and digital governance transformation in local communities
Vol 4, Issue 6, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract
Digital governance can improve public service delivery, but meaningful transformation requires more than adopting new technologies. This study examines how local government innovation capacity shapes organizational adaptation and public service change in Makassar City, Indonesia. Using an exploratory qualitative case-study design, the study draws on in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis across regional apparatus organizations. The findings show a persistent gap between digital policy ambitions and the institutional readiness required for implementation. Dedicated coordination units have strengthened data governance, yet fragmented information systems, uneven frontline digital competencies, hierarchical routines, and weak cross-agency integration continue to constrain reform. Frontline reluctance to use new systems is interpreted not as simple opposition to technology, but as an adaptive response to fragmented procedures, limited training, and increased administrative workload. The analysis shows that durable digital reform depends on adaptive leadership, cross-unit integration, workforce development, and institutional arrangements that can survive political and organizational change. To reduce the risk of widening the digital divide, local governments should shift from fragmented, project-based initiatives to inclusive institutional capabilities that align technology with service needs and public value.
Keywords
References
1. Alfawaire F, Atan T. The effect of strategic human resource and knowledge management on sustainable competitive advantages at Jordanian universities: The mediating role of organizational innovation. Sustainability. 2021; 13(15): 8445. doi: 10.3390/su13158445
2. Obasi IC, Benson C. The impact of digitalization and information and communication technology on the nature and organization of work and the emerging challenges for occupational safety and health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2025; 22(3): 362. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030362
3. Al Maazmi A, Piya S, Araci Z. Exploring the critical success factors influencing the outcome of digital transformation initiatives in government organizations. Systems. 2024; 12(12): 524. doi: 10.3390/systems12120524
4. Abrell T, Benker A, Pihlajamaa M. User knowledge utilization in innovation of complex products and systems: An absorptive capacity perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2018; 27(2): 169–182. doi: 10.1111/caim.12244
5. Rocha W. Measuring the innovation capacity and performance of organizations: A balanced scorecard approach combined with analytic network process. PUC-Rio Archive. 2021. Available online: https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/53178/53178.PDF
6. Djatmiko G, Sinaga O, Pawirosumarto S. Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability. 2025; 17(7): 2908. doi: 10.3390/su17072908
7. Latupeirissa J, Dewi NLY, Prayana IKR, et al. Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability. 2024; 16(7): 2818. doi: 10.3390/su16072818
8. Atobishi T, Moh’d Abu Bakir S, Nosratabadi S. How do digital capabilities affect organizational performance in the public sector? The mediating role of organizational agility. Administrative Sciences. 2024; 14(2): 37. doi: 10.3390/admsci14020037
9. Peralta A, Rubalcaba L. How governance paradigms and other drivers affect public managers’ use of innovation practices: A PLS-SEM analysis and model. Mathematics. 2021; 9(9): 1055. doi: 10.3390/math9091055
10. Badasjane V, Granlund A, Ahlskog M, Bruch J. Coordination of digital transformation in international manufacturing networks—challenges and coping mechanisms from an organizational perspective. Sustainability. 2022; 14(4): 2204. doi: 10.3390/su14042204
11. Larionova K, Synyuk O, Donchenko T, Kapinos H. Enterprise innovation-driven development management based on the assessment of restructuring capacity. Science and Innovation. 2022; 18(2): 30–43. doi: 10.15407/scine18.02.030
12. Lozada N, Arias-Pérez J, Henao-García E. Unveiling the effects of big data analytics capability on innovation capability through absorptive capacity: Why more and better insights matter. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 2023; 36(2): 680–701. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-02-2021-0092
13. Abdelaty H, Weiss D. R&D capacity and the innovation collaboration paradox: The moderating role of the appropriation strategy. Innovation. 2023; 25(2): 111–128. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2021.1971992
14. David A, Yigitcanlar T, Li R, et al. Understanding local government digital technology adoption strategies: A PRISMA review. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12): 9645. doi: 10.3390/su15129645
15. Thomass B. Public service media, civil society and transparency. International Journal of Digital Television. 2016; 7(3): 297–313. doi: 10.1386/jdtv.7.3.297_1
16. Chavoshi Z, Khashei V. The effect of organizational learning mechanisms on strategic innovation capacity. Journal of Strategic Management Studies. 2022; 13(50): 21–38. doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.135056
17. Rusu C, Bilţi R, Barbu F, Bălan L. The impact of workforce diversity, innovation capacity and corporate social responsibility on the image of the organization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence. 2023; 17(1): 1119–1127. doi: 10.2478/picbe-2023-0100
18. Asteriniah F. Public service quality in administration in Kalidoni Kelurahan Office, Palembang City. Journal of Public Administration Studies. 2022; 7(1): 26–30. doi: 10.21776/ub.jpas.2022.007.01.5
19. Gardziulevičienė L, Raišys S, Raišienė A. Drivers fostering citizens to participate in co-creation process for public service quality. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research. 2022; 88(1): 55–68. doi: 10.2478/mosr-2022-0012
20. Damke L, Maffini Gomes C, Marques Kneipp J, et al. Sustainable management practices and innovation capacity in family agribusinesses. Environmental Quality Management. 2021; 30(4): 5–20. doi: 10.1002/tqem.21724
21. Thakur A, Bhageerathy R, Mithra P, et al. Navigating organizational challenges of digital transformation: A qualitative study of meso-level public health officers in an Indian high-priority aspirational district. Administrative Sciences. 2025; 15(10): 397. doi: 10.3390/admsci15100397
22. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1985.
23. Nazir M, Akbar M, Yu X, et al. Environmental, social, and governance performance as an influencing factor of financial sustainability: Evidence from the global high-tech sector. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2024; 31(5): 4746–4758. doi: 10.1002/csr.2831
24. Lecic M, Milic B, Visnjic R, Culibrk J. Leadership, innovative behavior and the case of innovative climate—when the mediator becomes the mediated. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(1): 40. doi: 10.3390/bs13010040
25. Antonenko I, Ovcharov D. Ways to intensify innovation capacity of the regional economy. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 2019; 83: 412–416. doi: 10.2991/cssdre-19.2019.80
26. Jasimuddin S, Naqshbandi MM. Knowledge infrastructure capability, absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation: Evidence from SMEs in France. Production Planning & Control. 2019; 30(10–12): 893–906. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1582097
27. Veseli A, Hasanaj P, Bajraktari A. Perceptions of organizational change readiness for sustainable digital transformation: Insights from learning management system projects in higher education institutions. Sustainability. 2025; 17(2): 619. doi: 10.3390/su17020619
28. Matias-Pereira J. Governance in the public sector: Emphasis on better management, transparency and society participation. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2022; 8(9): 63172–63195. doi: 10.34117/bjdv8n9-183
29. Haug N, Dan S, Mergel I. Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review. 2024; 26(7): 1963–1987. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917
30. Mettler T, Miscione G, Jacobs CD, Guenduez AA. Same same but different: How policies frame societal-level digital transformation. Government Information Quarterly. 2024; 41(2): 101932. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101932
31. Mutiarin D, Lawelai H, Sadat A, et al. Interoperability governance: An analysis of the impact of digitization of public services on local government. Journal of Local Government Issues. 2024; 7(2): 111–128. doi: 10.22219/logos.v7i2.30388
32. Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation; 2010.
33. Klemsdal L, Andreassen TA, Breit E. Resisting or facilitating change? How street-level managers’ situational work contributes to the implementation of public reforms. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2022; 32(4): 736–749. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muac004
34. Eiró F, Lotta G. On the frontline of global inequalities: A decolonial approach to the study of street-level bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2024; 34(1): 67–79. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muad019
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Digital Public Infrastructure for Digital Governments. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 68. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2024. doi: 10.1787/ff525dc8-en
36. Eom SJ, Lee J. Digital government transformation in turbulent times: Responses, challenges, and future direction. Government Information Quarterly. 2022; 39(2): 101690. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690
37. Twizeyimana JD, Andersson A. The public value of e-government—A literature review. Government Information Quarterly. 2019; 36(2): 167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
Supporting Agencies
Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Anas, Batara Surya, Imran Ismail, Muh Syukri, Lilis Suryani, Kittisak Wongmahesak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Prof. Kittisak Wongmahesak
North Bangkok University (Thailand)
The editorial team of SSD is delighted to congratulate our Editor-in-Chief, Professor Kittisak Wongmahesak, on his outstanding achievement in the Top 1000 Scholar rankings.
It is with deep regret that we announce the cancellation of the Forum on Sustainable Social Development & Computing and Artificial Intelligence, originally scheduled for June 15, 2025.
